AWALIYA, RIZKA (2026) ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN VOLUME DAN BIAYA PEKERJAAN STRUKTUR BAJA MENGGUNAKAN METODE KONVENSIONAL DAN AUTODESK REVIT (STUDI KASUS: PROYEK GUDANG 3 LANTAI, KEC. KALIDERES). S1 thesis, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta.
|
Text (HAL COVER)
COVER.pdf Download (762kB) | Preview |
|
![[img]](https://repository.mercubuana.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text (BAB I)
BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (299kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB II)
BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (483kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB III)
BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (667kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB IV)
BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (784kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB V)
BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (273kB) |
|
|
Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFPUS.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (277kB) |
Abstract
This study aims to compare the results of volume and cost calculations for steel structure work between the conventional method and the Building Information Modeling (BIM) method using Autodesk Revit in a three-story warehouse construction project in Kalideres, West Jakarta. The variables studied include the volume of work and cost estimates for the steel structure, with the conventional calculation method and the BIM method serving as comparison variables. The research subject is a three-story warehouse project focused on steel structural elements such as columns, beams, and rafters. The data analysis method used is comparative quantitative analysis, which involves comparing the calculation results from both methods and calculating the differences and their percentages. The results show that the BIM method yields a lower volume of work compared to the conventional method for most elements, while bolt calculations are relatively similar because they are based on the number of units. This difference in volume affects cost estimates, with the conventional method yielding a total cost of Rp2,856,098,106.58, while the BIM method yields Rp2,716,698.76, resulting in a difference of Rp139,399,265.83, or approximately 4.88%. Furthermore, while the conventional method is easier to use, it does not automatically integrate with design drawings; in contrast, Autodesk Revit is more efficient in volume calculations and design revisions, although it requires a longer initial modeling time. Consequently, the BIM method is considered more accurate and efficient in generating volume and cost calculations, making it a viable alternative for construction project cost planning. Keywords: Building Information Modeling (BIM), Autodesk Revit, steel structures, scope of work, cost estimation Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan hasil perhitungan volume dan biaya pekerjaan struktur baja antara metode konvensional dan metode Building Information Modeling (BIM) menggunakan Autodesk Revit pada proyek pembangunan gudang tiga lantai di Kalideres, Jakarta Barat. Variabel yang diteliti meliputi volume pekerjaan dan estimasi biaya struktur baja, dengan metode perhitungan konvensional dan BIM sebagai variabel pembanding. Objek penelitian yaitu proyek gudang tiga lantai yang difokuskan pada elemen struktur baja seperti kolom, balok, rafter. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis kuantitatif komparatif dengan membandingkan hasil perhitungan dari kedua metode serta menghitung selisih dan persentasenya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode BIM menghasilkan volume pekerjaan yang lebih rendah dibandingkan metode konvensional pada sebagian besar elemen, sementara perhitungan baut relatif sama karena berbasis jumlah unit. Perbedaan volume tersebut berdampak pada estimasi biaya, di mana metode konvensional menghasilkan total biaya sebesar Rp2.856.098.106,58, sedangkan metode BIM sebesar Rp2.716.698,76, sehingga terdapat selisih sebesar Rp139.399.265,83 atau sekitar 4,88%. Selain itu, metode konvensional unggul dalam kemudahan penggunaan namun tidak terintegrasi otomatis dengan gambar desain, sedangkan Autodesk Revit lebih efisien dalam perhitungan volume dan revisi desain meski membutuhkan waktu pemodelan awal yang lebih lama. Dengan demikian, metode BIM dinilai lebih akurat dan efisien dalam menghasilkan perhitungan volume dan biaya, sehingga dapat dijadikan alternatif dalam perencanaan biaya proyek konstruksi. Kata Kunci: Building Information Modeling (BIM), Autodesk Revit, struktur baja, volume pekerjaan, estimasi biaya
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| NIM/NIDN Creators: | 41122010001 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Building Information Modeling (BIM), Autodesk Revit, struktur baja, volume pekerjaan, estimasi biaya |
| Subjects: | 600 Technology/Teknologi > 620 Engineering and Applied Operations/Ilmu Teknik dan operasi Terapan > 624 Civil Engineering/Teknik Sipil 600 Technology/Teknologi > 620 Engineering and Applied Operations/Ilmu Teknik dan operasi Terapan > 624 Civil Engineering/Teknik Sipil > 624.9 Building, Structure, and Installation/Bangunan, Struktur, dan Instalasi 600 Technology/Teknologi > 690 Buildings/Teknik Bangunan > 692 Auxiliary Construction Practices/Lain-lain yang Berhubungan dengan Pekerjaan Konstruksi > 692.5 Estimates of Labor, Time, Materials/Prakiraan Biaya Tenaga Kerja, Waktu dan Bahan-bahan |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Sipil |
| Depositing User: | khalimah |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Oct 2026 16:37 |
| Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2026 16:37 |
| URI: | http://repository.mercubuana.ac.id/id/eprint/104269 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
