STUDI PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN METODE AHP DAN SAW PADA PROSES TENDER STASIUN TRANSMISI TELEVISI

SUTOYO, PURWONO (2021) STUDI PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN METODE AHP DAN SAW PADA PROSES TENDER STASIUN TRANSMISI TELEVISI. S2 thesis, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta.

Preview	Text (HAL COVER) 01. Cover-dll - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Download (797kB) | Preview
	Text (BAB I) 02. BAB I - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (330kB)
	Text (BAB II) 03. BAB II - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (945kB)
	Text (BAB III) 04. BAB III - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (749kB)
	Text (BAB IV) 05. BAB IV - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB V) 06. BAB V - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (254kB)
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 07. DAFTAR PUSTAKA - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (565kB)
	Text (LAMPIRAN) 08. Lampiran-lampiran - IPUNG SUTOYO.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (8MB)

Abstract

MNC Media is one of the largest and most developed television groups in the Southeast Asia region. In its development, this tv group is actively expanding and updating transmission equipment in the regions, one of which is in the Denpasar broadcast services area through a tender mechanism. This research compares two methods of Decision Support System (DSS), namely: Analytic Hierarchy Process abbreviated as AHP and Simple Additive Weighting abbreviated as SAW, by taking a case study regarding the tender process of MNC television transmission stations for Denpasar locations. This research was conducted based on four main criteria, namely: price, quality, service and reliability in determining the winning bidder, which was followed by three alternative participants (PT. Axx, PT. Nx and PT. Lxx). This research was conducted to obtain an overview of the results of the assessment of the criteria weights for each method used. Thus the alternative final results will be seen which is a priority and can provide recommendations at the comparative analysis point of the two methods. The final result of the calculation using the AHP method shows that alternative priorities ranked 1st to 3rd are PT. Axx total value of 0.592, PT. Nx total value of 0.274 and PT. Lxx total value of 0.134. While the calculation using the SAW method obtained an alternative priority ranking 1st to 3rd is PT. Axx total value of 0.95325, PT. Nx total value of 0.92185 and PT. Lxx total value is 0.71585. The final score results obtained from various calculations are not the same, which indicates that the maturity of the data processed to be accurate information varies. The SAW method is more widely used because the calculation process is easier to understand, fast and simple than the AHP method. Whereas AHP is superior in data accuracy, because the value of criteria weights is not arbitrarily determined, but is generated based on calculations. It is expected that the results of the comparison and the provision of these recommendations can then be used as a reference in the procurement tender process within the scope of MNC Media Group. Keywords: tender, comparison, criteria, alternatives, AHP, SAW MNC Media merupakan salah satu grup televisi yang sangat berkembang dan terbesar di kawasan Asia Tenggara. Dalam perkembangannya, grup tv ini aktif melakukan ekspansi dan pembaharuan peralatan transmisi di daerah, salah satunya di wilayah siaran Denpasar melalui mekanisme tender. Penelitian ini membandingkan dua metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) yaitu: Analytic Hierarchy Process disingkat AHP dan Simple Additive Weighting disingkat SAW, dengan mengambil studi kasus mengenai proses tender stasiun transmisi televisi MNC untuk lokasi Denpasar. Penelitian ini dilakukan berdasarkan empat kriteria utama, yaitu: harga, kualitas, pelayanan dan keandalan dalam menentukan pemenang tender yang di ikuti oleh tiga alternatif peserta (PT. Axx, PT. Nx dan PT. Lxx). Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk memperoleh gambaran tentang hasil penilaian bobot kriteria pada masing-masing metode yang digunakan. Dengan demikian akan terlihat hasil akhir alternatif mana yang menjadi prioritas dan dapat memberikan rekomendasi pada point analisa perbandingan kedua metode tersebut. Hasil akhir penghitungan dengan metode AHP menunjukan prioritas alternatif peringkat ke-1 hingga ke-3 adalah PT. Axx total nilai 0.592, PT. Nx total nilai 0.274 dan PT. Lxx total nilai 0.134. Sedangkan penghitungan dengan metode SAW didapatkan prioritas alternatif peringkat ke-1 hingga ke-3 adalah PT. Axx total nilai 0.95325, PT. Nx total nilai 0.92185 dan PT. Lxx total nilai 0.71585. Hasil skor akhir yang didapatkan dari berbagai perhitungan tidaklah sama, yang menandakan bahwa kematangan dari data yang diolah agar menjadi informasi yang akurat berbedabeda. Metode SAW lebih banyak digunakan karena proses perhitungannya lebih mudah dipahami, cepat juga simple dibandingkan metode AHP. Sedangkan AHP lebih unggul dalam keakuratan data, karena nilai bobot kriteria tidaklah sembarang ditentukan, melainkan dihasilkan berdasarkan perhitungan. Diharapkan hasil perbandingan dan pemberian rekomendasi tersebut selanjutnya dapat digunakan sebagai acuan dalam proses tender pengadaan peralatan di lingkup MNC Media Grup. Kata kunci: tender, perbandingan, kriteria, alternatif, AHP, SAW

Actions (login required)

View Item