ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN VOLUME TULANGAN BETON BERDASARKAN SNI 2847:2019 DAN BS 8666:2020 MENGGUNAKAN METODE BAR BENDING SCHEDULE (BBS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM)

PRATAMA, ADE KURNIAWAN (2026) ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN VOLUME TULANGAN BETON BERDASARKAN SNI 2847:2019 DAN BS 8666:2020 MENGGUNAKAN METODE BAR BENDING SCHEDULE (BBS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM). S1 thesis, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta.

[img]
Preview
Text (Cover)
COVER.pdf

Download (543kB) | Preview
[img] Text (Bab 1)
BAB 1.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (318kB)
[img] Text (Bab 2)
BAB 2.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (849kB)
[img] Text (Bab 3)
BAB 3.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (525kB)
[img] Text (Bab 4)
BAB 4.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (Bab 5)
BAB 5.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (272kB)
[img] Text (Daftar Pustaka)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (267kB)
[img] Text (Lampiran)
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Metode perhitungan tulangan beton secara konvensional masih banyak digunakan dalam perencanaan struktur di Indonesia, namun umumnya belum mempertimbangkan detail pemotongan dan pembengkokan tulangan secara rinci. Pada penelitian sebelumnya di proyek Gedung Layanan Kesehatan Tahap I Universitas Trunojoyo Madura ditemukan potensi waste material pada elemen balok dan kolom. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini dilakukan pada proyek Gedung Layanan Kesehatan Tahap II Universitas Trunojoyo Madura dengan fokus pada elemen balok dan kolom. Metode yang digunakan meliputi perhitungan konvensional, Bar Bending Schedule (BBS) berbasis SNI 2847:2019, serta BBS berbasis BS 8666:2020 dengan pendekatan Building Information Modeling (BIM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan volume tulangan antar metode, di mana BBS berbasis SNI 2847:2019 menghasilkan selisih sebesar 4,11% dan BBS berbasis BS 8666:2020 sebesar 6,52% terhadap metode konvensional. Perbedaan tersebut berdampak pada estimasi biaya pekerjaan tulangan, dengan metode BBS berbasis BS 8666:2020 menghasilkan biaya yang lebih rendah. Conventional methods for reinforced concrete calculation are still widely used in Indonesia but often do not consider detailed cutting and bending of reinforcement bars. Previous studies on the Phase I Health Service Building project at Universitas Trunojoyo Madura identified potential material waste in beam and column elements. This study was conducted on the Phase II Health Service Building project, focusing on beams and columns. The methods applied include conventional calculation, Bar Bending Schedule (BBS) based on SNI 2847:2019, and BBS based on BS 8666:2020 using Building Information Modeling (BIM). The results show reinforcement volume differences of 4.11% for BBS SNI 2847:2019 and 6.52% for BBS BS 8666:2020 compared to the conventional method, affecting reinforcement cost estimation, where BS 8666:2020 produces lower costs.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
NIM/NIDN Creators: 41119120144
Uncontrolled Keywords: Tulangan beton, Metode konvensional, BBS, SNI 2847:2019, BS 8666
Subjects: 600 Technology/Teknologi > 620 Engineering and Applied Operations/Ilmu Teknik dan operasi Terapan > 624 Civil Engineering/Teknik Sipil
600 Technology/Teknologi > 620 Engineering and Applied Operations/Ilmu Teknik dan operasi Terapan > 624 Civil Engineering/Teknik Sipil > 624.1 Structural Engineering and Underground Construction/Teknik Struktural dan Konstruksi Bawah Tanah
Divisions: Fakultas Teknik > Teknik Sipil
Depositing User: Haqi ar rachma nur
Date Deposited: 02 Apr 2026 03:55
Last Modified: 02 Apr 2026 03:55
URI: http://repository.mercubuana.ac.id/id/eprint/101393

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item