ALMALIYA, SHAFA (2025) ANALISIS PENJADWALAN PROYEK PEMBUATAN DUCTING MENGGUNAKAN METODE CPM DAN PERT DI CV SF INDUSTRIES. S1 thesis, Universitas Mercu Buana Jakarta.
|
Text (HAL COVER)
01 COVER.pdf Download (617kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Text (BAB I)
02 BAB 1.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (340kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (BAB II)
03 BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (485kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (BAB III)
04 BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (313kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (BAB IV)
05 BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (644kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (BAB V)
06 BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (234kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
07 DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (197kB) |
|
![]() |
Text (LAMPIRAN)
08 LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (393kB) |
Abstract
The ducting installation project by CV SF Industries experienced a delay from the planned 120 days to 138 days. To address this, PERT and CPM methods were applied for scheduling analysis. PERT uses three time estimates (optimistic, most likely, pessimistic) to calculate expected duration and variance, while CPM applies a deterministic approach. The analysis showed the project duration could be reduced to 98 days using PERT (with a 99.99% completion probability), 96 days with CPM, and 93 days after acceleration. The critical path identified by PERT is A-B-C-E-F-G-H-I-J, while CPM's is A–B–C–E–F–G–H–I–J. Activities C, D, and G had the highest variance, indicating high uncertainty. The application of both methods proved effective in minimizing delays and supporting project acceleration. It is recommended that the company integrate time and risk analysis in project planning, while future research may focus on equipment and resource optimization. Keywords: Ducting, project delay, PERT, CPM Proyek pembuatan ducting CV SF Industries mengalami keterlambatan dari 120 menjadi 138 hari. Untuk mengatasinya, digunakan metode PERT dan CPM dalam analisis penjadwalan. PERT menggunakan tiga estimasi waktu (optimis, realistis, pesimis) untuk menghitung durasi ekspektasi dan varians, sedangkan CPM memakai pendekatan deterministik. Hasilnya, durasi proyek dapat dipersingkat menjadi 98 hari dengan PERT (probabilitas 99,99%), 96 hari dengan CPM, dan 93 hari setelah percepatan. Jalur kritis PERT adalah A-B-C-E-F-G-H-I-J, sedangkan CPM adalah A–B–C–E–F–G–H–I–J. Aktivitas C, D, dan G memiliki varians terbesar, menunjukkan ketidakpastian tinggi. Penerapan kedua metode ini efektif dalam meminimalkan keterlambatan dan membantu percepatan proyek. Disarankan agar perusahaan mempertimbangkan analisis waktu dan risiko dalam perencanaan serta penelitian lanjutan fokus pada optimalisasi peralatan dan sumber daya. Kata kunci: Proyek ducting, keterlambatan proyek, PERT, CPM
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |